Publications by Michael Bretthauer
318 publications found
Original articles
Gastroenterology/Hepatology: What You May Have Missed in 2023
Ann Intern Med (in press)
DOI 10.7326/M24-0505, PubMed 38621241
[Not Available]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 144 (5)
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.24.0141, PubMed 38651715
How to learn from interval cancers in colorectal cancer screening
Endoscopy, 56 (5), 373-375
DOI 10.1055/a-2279-9932, PubMed 38479414
Effectiveness of Colonoscopy Screening vs Sigmoidoscopy Screening in Colorectal Cancer
JAMA Netw Open, 7 (2), e240007
DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0007, PubMed 38421651
Lifetime Gained With Cancer Screening-Reply
JAMA Intern Med, 184 (2), 228
DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.7067, PubMed 38165695
Estimated Lifetime Gained With Cancer Screening Tests: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
JAMA Intern Med, 183 (11), 1196-1203
DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.3798, PubMed 37639247
[Not Available]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 143 (14)
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.23.0110, PubMed 37830968
The Future of Cancer Screening-Guided Without Conflicts of Interest
JAMA Intern Med, 183 (10), 1047-1048
DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.4064, PubMed 37639267
Informed consent for endoscopic procedures: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement
Endoscopy, 55 (10), 952-966
DOI 10.1055/a-2133-3365, PubMed 37557899
New American College of Physicians Guidance on Colorectal Cancer Screening: Less Is More
Ann Intern Med, 176 (8), 1127-1128
DOI 10.7326/M23-1695, PubMed 37523706
Qualitative study of guideline panelists: innovative surveys provided valuable insights regarding patient values and preferences
J Clin Epidemiol, 161, 173-180
DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.07.014, PubMed 37517505
A novel framework for incorporating patient values and preferences in making guideline recommendations: guideline panel surveys
J Clin Epidemiol, 161, 164-172
DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.07.003, PubMed 37453455
What is my risk, doctor? How to convey disease risk and treatment effects
BMJ, 381, e075289
DOI 10.1136/bmj-2022-075289, PubMed 37328165
A Comparison of Risk Classification Systems of Colorectal Adenomas: A Case-Cohort Study
Gastroenterology, 165 (2), 483-491.e7
DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.04.028, PubMed 37146913
Risk of malignant lymphomas in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based cohort study
BMJ Open Gastroenterol, 10 (1)
DOI 10.1136/bmjgast-2022-001037, PubMed 37142293
Combination of Mucosa-Exposure Device and Computer-Aided Detection for Adenoma Detection During Colonoscopy: A Randomized Trial
Gastroenterology, 165 (1), 244-251.e3
DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.03.237, PubMed 37061169
A pilot study of implementation of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) in Norway
Scand J Gastroenterol, 58 (10), 1180-1184
DOI 10.1080/00365521.2023.2204389, PubMed 37128713
Speedometer for withdrawal time monitoring during colonoscopy: a clinical implementation trial
Scand J Gastroenterol, 58 (6), 664-670
DOI 10.1080/00365521.2022.2154616, PubMed 36519564
Artificial intelligence in gastroenterology: Where are we heading?
Endosc Int Open, 10 (11), E1474-E1480
DOI 10.1055/a-1907-6569, PubMed 36397868
Comparative Performance of Artificial Intelligence Optical Diagnosis Systems for Leaving in Situ Colorectal Polyps
Gastroenterology, 164 (3), 467-469.e4
DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.10.021, PubMed 36328079
Rates of repeated colonoscopies to clean the colon from low-risk and high-risk adenomas: results from the EPoS trials
Gut, 72 (5), 951-957
DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327696, PubMed 36307178
15-Year Benefits of Sigmoidoscopy Screening on Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality : A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trials
Ann Intern Med, 175 (11), 1525-1533
DOI 10.7326/M22-0835, PubMed 36215714
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death
N Engl J Med, 387 (17), 1547-1556
DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa2208375, PubMed 36214590
Clinical trial designs for artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 7 (9), 785-786
DOI 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00232-1, PubMed 35932767
Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Colonoscopy Surveillance After Polyp Removal: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trials
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 21 (4), 949-959.e2
DOI 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.08.022, PubMed 36038128
Reducing the environmental footprint of gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) Position Statement
Endoscopy, 54 (8), 797-826
DOI 10.1055/a-1859-3726, PubMed 35803275
Impact of artificial intelligence on colorectal polyp detection for early-career endoscopists: an international comparative study
Scand J Gastroenterol, 57 (10), 1272-1277
DOI 10.1080/00365521.2022.2070436, PubMed 35605150
Emergency hospital admissions, prognosis, and population mortality in Norway during the first wave of the Covid-19 epidemic
Scand J Public Health, 50 (6), 795-802
DOI 10.1177/14034948221082959, PubMed 35546560
Novel "resect and analysis" approach for T2 colorectal cancer with use of artificial intelligence
Gastrointest Endosc, 96 (4), 665-672.e1
DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2022.04.1305, PubMed 35500659
Artificial intelligence for disease diagnosis: the criterion standard challenge
Gastrointest Endosc, 96 (2), 370-372
DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2022.04.057, PubMed 35489396
Cost-effectiveness of artificial intelligence for screening colonoscopy: a modelling study
Lancet Digit Health, 4 (6), e436-e444
DOI 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00042-5, PubMed 35430151
Real-Time Artificial Intelligence-Based Optical Diagnosis of Neoplastic Polyps during Colonoscopy
NEJM Evid, 1 (6), EVIDoa2200003
DOI 10.1056/EVIDoa2200003, PubMed 38319238
Inflammatory bowel disease and risk of adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumors in the small bowel
Ann Oncol, 33 (6), 649-656
DOI 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.02.226, PubMed 35276334
Risk of hepato-pancreato-biliary cancer is increased by primary sclerosing cholangitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A population-based cohort study
United European Gastroenterol J, 10 (2), 212-224
DOI 10.1002/ueg2.12204, PubMed 35107865
Covid-19 transmission in fitness centers in Norway - a randomized trial
BMC Public Health, 21 (1), 2103
DOI 10.1186/s12889-021-12073-0, PubMed 34789188
Long-term colorectal cancer incidence and mortality after adenoma removal in women and men
Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 55 (4), 412-421
DOI 10.1111/apt.16686, PubMed 34716941
A novel intragastric balloon for treatment of obesity and type 2 diabetes. A two-center pilot trial
Scand J Gastroenterol, 57 (2), 232-238
DOI 10.1080/00365521.2021.1994641, PubMed 34714203
Mortality in Norway and Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic
Scand J Public Health, 50 (1), 38-45
DOI 10.1177/14034948211047137, PubMed 34609261
Women require routine opioids to prevent painful colonoscopies: a randomised controlled trial
Scand J Gastroenterol, 56 (12), 1480-1489
DOI 10.1080/00365521.2021.1969683, PubMed 34534048
Association of Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenoma Characteristics With Colorectal Cancer Mortality After Screening Colonoscopy
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 19 (9), 1890-1898
DOI 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.04.023, PubMed 33878471
Estimation of overdiagnosis in colorectal cancer screening with sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood testing: comparison of simulation models
BMJ Open, 11 (4), e042158
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042158, PubMed 33853794
The impact of information about different absolute benefits and harms on intention to participate in colorectal cancer screening: A think-aloud study and online randomised experiment
PLoS One, 16 (2), e0246991
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0246991, PubMed 33592037
Artificial intelligence in colonoscopy - Now on the market. What's next?
J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 36 (1), 7-11
DOI 10.1111/jgh.15339, PubMed 33179322
Colorectal polyp characterization with endocytoscopy: Ready for widespread implementation with artificial intelligence?
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 52-53, 101721
DOI 10.1016/j.bpg.2020.101721, PubMed 34172248
How do cancer screening guidelines trade off benefits versus harms and burdens of screening? A systematic survey
BMJ Open, 10 (12), e038322
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038322, PubMed 33268404
Establishing thresholds for important benefits considering the harms of screening interventions
BMJ Open, 10 (12), e037854
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037854, PubMed 33268400
Colorectal Cancer Screening With Repeated Fecal Immunochemical Test Versus Sigmoidoscopy: Baseline Results From a Randomized Trial
Gastroenterology, 160 (4), 1085-1096.e5
DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.11.037, PubMed 33227280
The COVID-19 pandemic in Norway and Sweden - threats, trust, and impact on daily life: a comparative survey
BMC Public Health, 20 (1), 1597
DOI 10.1186/s12889-020-09615-3, PubMed 33097011
Colonoscopist Performance and Colorectal Cancer Risk After Adenoma Removal to Stratify Surveillance: Two Nationwide Observational Studies
Gastroenterology, 160 (4), 1067-1074.e6
DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.10.009, PubMed 33065063
Incomplete endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps: a prospective quality assurance study
Endoscopy, 53 (4), 383-391
DOI 10.1055/a-1243-0379, PubMed 32961579
Ongoing Trials Will Not Determine the Comparative Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests
Gastroenterology, 164 (6), 856-860
DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.02.071, PubMed 32585308
Designs of colonoscopic adenoma detection trials: more positive results with tandem than with parallel studies - an analysis of studies on imaging techniques and mechanical devices
Gut, 70 (2), 268-275
DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-320984, PubMed 32409588
Laparoscopy-assisted versus balloon enteroscopy-assisted ERCP after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
Endoscopy, 52 (8), 654-661
DOI 10.1055/a-1139-9313, PubMed 32316042
Cost savings in colonoscopy with artificial intelligence-aided polyp diagnosis: an add-on analysis of a clinical trial (with video)
Gastrointest Endosc, 92 (4), 905-911.e1
DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2020.03.3759, PubMed 32240683
[National screening programme for colorectal cancer]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 140 (3)
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.19.0658, PubMed 32105033
[Colorectal cancer screening, yes or no?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 139 (15)
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.19.0323, PubMed 31642636
Colorectal cancer screening with faecal immunochemical testing, sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy: a microsimulation modelling study
BMJ, 367, l5383
DOI 10.1136/bmj.l5383, PubMed 31578177
Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality After Removal of Adenomas During Screening Colonoscopies
Gastroenterology, 158 (4), 875-883.e5
DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.09.011, PubMed 31563625
Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2019
Endoscopy, 51 (8), 775-794
DOI 10.1055/a-0959-0505, PubMed 31295746
Implications of different guidelines for surveillance after serrated polyp resection in United States of America and Europe
Endoscopy, 51 (8), 750-758
DOI 10.1055/a-0916-8598, PubMed 31195423
Performance measures for small-bowel endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative
Endoscopy, 51 (6), 574-598
DOI 10.1055/a-0889-9586, PubMed 31075800
Effectiveness of digital feedback on patient experience and 30-day complications after screening colonoscopy: a randomized health services study
Endosc Int Open, 7 (4), E537-E544
DOI 10.1055/a-0830-4648, PubMed 31041371
Effects of Oral Anticoagulants and Aspirin on Performance of Fecal Immunochemical Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening
Gastroenterology, 156 (6), 1642-1649.e1
DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.040, PubMed 30689972
Polyp detection rates as quality indicator in clinical versus screening colonoscopy
Endosc Int Open, 7 (2), E195-E202
DOI 10.1055/a-0796-6477, PubMed 30705953
Registration bias in a clinical quality register
Endosc Int Open, 7 (1), E90-E98
DOI 10.1055/a-0806-7006, PubMed 30652120
Performance measures for endoscopy services: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative
Endoscopy, 50 (12), 1186-1204
DOI 10.1055/a-0755-7515, PubMed 30423593
Performance measures for ERCP and endoscopic ultrasound: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative
Endoscopy, 50 (11), 1116-1127
DOI 10.1055/a-0749-8767, PubMed 30340220
Mortality From Postscreening (Interval) Colorectal Cancers Is Comparable to That From Cancer in Unscreened Patients-A Randomized Sigmoidoscopy Trial
Gastroenterology, 155 (6), 1787-1794.e3
DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.035, PubMed 30165051
Uterine morcellation and survival in uterine sarcomas
Eur J Cancer, 101, 62-68
DOI 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.06.007, PubMed 30025231
Polypectomy techniques among gastroenterologists in Norway - a nationwide survey
Endosc Int Open, 6 (7), E812-E820
DOI 10.1055/a-0607-0727, PubMed 29977999
Number of Adenomas Removed and Colorectal Cancers Prevented in Randomized Trials of Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening
Gastroenterology, 155 (4), 1059-1068.e2
DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.06.040, PubMed 29935150
Long-Term Effectiveness of Sigmoidoscopy Screening on Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Women and Men: A Randomized Trial
Ann Intern Med, 168 (11), 775-782
DOI 10.7326/M17-1441, PubMed 29710125
Endoscopy assistants influence the quality of colonoscopy
Endoscopy, 50 (9), 871-877
DOI 10.1055/s-0044-101706, PubMed 29444529
[New specialist training for physicians - from Swiss cheese to strongman?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 137 (17)
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.17.0637, PubMed 28925200
Colorectal cancer death after adenoma removal in Scandinavia
Scand J Gastroenterol, 52 (12), 1377-1384
DOI 10.1080/00365521.2017.1377763, PubMed 28906163
Domains associated with successful quality improvement in healthcare - a nationwide case study
BMC Health Serv Res, 17 (1), 648
DOI 10.1186/s12913-017-2454-2, PubMed 28903723
Local emergency medical response after a terrorist attack in Norway: a qualitative study
BMJ Qual Saf, 26 (10), 806-816
DOI 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006517, PubMed 28676492
Epidemiology and risk factors of colorectal polyps
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 31 (4), 419-424
DOI 10.1016/j.bpg.2017.06.004, PubMed 28842051
Cecum intubation rate as quality indicator in clinical versus screening colonoscopy
Endosc Int Open, 5 (6), E489-E495
DOI 10.1055/s-0043-106180, PubMed 28573182
Sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood test - a comparative screening trial
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 137 (10), 727-730
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.16.1031, PubMed 28551972
Patient-reported adverse events after colonoscopy in Norway
Endoscopy, 49 (8), 745-753
DOI 10.1055/s-0043-105265, PubMed 28445903
Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative
Endoscopy, 49 (4), 378-397
DOI 10.1055/s-0043-103411, PubMed 28268235
Effectiveness of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in men and women and different age groups: pooled analysis of randomised trials
BMJ, 356, i6673
DOI 10.1136/bmj.i6673, PubMed 28087510
Are rapidly growing cancers more lethal?
Eur J Cancer, 72, 210-214
DOI 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.11.011, PubMed 28042992
Expert opinions and scientific evidence for colonoscopy key performance indicators
Gut, 65 (12), 2045-2060
DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312043, PubMed 27802153
Effectiveness of Screening Colonoscopy to Prevent Colorectal Cancer Among Medicare Beneficiaries Aged 70 to 79 Years: A Prospective Observational Study
Ann Intern Med, 166 (1), 18-26
DOI 10.7326/M16-0758, PubMed 27669524
Performance measures for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative
Endoscopy, 48 (9), 843-64
DOI 10.1055/s-0042-113128, PubMed 27548885
European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy - Establishing the key unanswered research questions within gastrointestinal endoscopy
Endoscopy, 48 (10), 884-891
DOI 10.1055/s-0042-110398, PubMed 27485483
Incentives and participation in a medical survey
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 136 (12-13), 1082-7
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.15.1096, PubMed 27381786
Population-Based Colonoscopy Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial
JAMA Intern Med, 176 (7), 894-902
DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0960, PubMed 27214731
Gradual stiffness versus magnetic imaging-guided variable stiffness colonoscopes: A randomized noninferiority trial
United European Gastroenterol J, 5 (1), 128-133
DOI 10.1177/2050640616639162, PubMed 28405331
Lifestyle changes at middle age and mortality: a population-based prospective cohort study
J Epidemiol Community Health, 71 (1), 59-66
DOI 10.1136/jech-2015-206760, PubMed 27312250
Routine vs. on-demand analgesia in colonoscopy: a randomized clinical trial
Endoscopy, 48 (9), 823-8
DOI 10.1055/s-0042-108433, PubMed 27305424
Rationale and design of the European Polyp Surveillance (EPoS) trials
Endoscopy, 48 (6), 571-8
DOI 10.1055/s-0042-104116, PubMed 27042931
The continuing uncertainty about cancer risk in inflammatory bowel disease
Gut, 65 (6), 889-93
DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-311003, PubMed 27008845
Requirements and standards facilitating quality improvement for reporting systems in gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement
Endoscopy, 48 (3), 291-4
DOI 10.1055/s-0042-100186, PubMed 26841269
The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Quality Improvement Initiative: developing performance measures
United European Gastroenterol J, 4 (1), 30-41
DOI 10.1177/2050640615624631, PubMed 26966520
The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Quality Improvement Initiative: developing performance measures
Endoscopy, 48 (1), 81-9
DOI 10.1055/s-0035-1569580, PubMed 26662057
Bounding the per-protocol effect in randomized trials: an application to colorectal cancer screening
Trials, 16, 541
DOI 10.1186/s13063-015-1056-8, PubMed 26620120
Do's and don'ts in evaluation of endoscopic screening for gastrointestinal cancers
Endoscopy, 48 (1), 75-80
DOI 10.1055/s-0034-1393094, PubMed 26382306
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Gut, 65 (5), 806-20
DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308481, PubMed 25681402
Leadership training to improve adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopy: a randomised trial
Gut, 65 (4), 616-24
DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307503, PubMed 25670810
Time trends in quality indicators of colonoscopy
United European Gastroenterol J, 4 (1), 110-20
DOI 10.1177/2050640615570147, PubMed 26966531
Clinical indications for computed tomographic colonography: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline
Eur Radiol, 25 (2), 331-45
DOI 10.1007/s00330-014-3435-z, PubMed 25278245
Water exchange versus carbon dioxide insufflation in unsedated colonoscopy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
Endoscopy, 47 (3), 192-9
DOI 10.1055/s-0034-1390795, PubMed 25412093
Long-term risk of colorectal cancer in individuals with serrated polyps
Gut, 64 (6), 929-36
DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307793, PubMed 25399542
[Implementation of guidelines for PSA testing in general practice]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 134 (21), 2032-4
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.14.0982, PubMed 25387926
Polyethylene glycol vs sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate for colonoscopy preparation
Endosc Int Open, 2 (4), E230-4
DOI 10.1055/s-0034-1377520, PubMed 26135098
Clinical indications for computed tomographic colonography: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline
Endoscopy, 46 (10), 897-915
DOI 10.1055/s-0034-1378092, PubMed 25268304
Long-term lifestyle changes after colorectal cancer screening: randomised controlled trial
Gut, 64 (8), 1268-76
DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307376, PubMed 25183203
Long-term colorectal-cancer mortality after adenoma removal
N Engl J Med, 371 (9), 799-807
DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa1315870, PubMed 25162886
Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: a randomized clinical trial
JAMA, 312 (6), 606-15
DOI 10.1001/jama.2014.8266, PubMed 25117129
[Comparative effectiveness research]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 134 (14), 1374
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.14.0485, PubMed 25096435
[What should non-inferiority studies be called in Norwegian?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 134 (8), 852-3
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.14.0059, PubMed 24780988
Comparative analysis of breast cancer mortality following mammography screening in Denmark and Norway
Ann Oncol, 25 (6), 1137-43
DOI 10.1093/annonc/mdu122, PubMed 24669012
Ethical issues in colorectal cancer screening
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 28 (2), 315-26
DOI 10.1016/j.bpg.2014.03.002, PubMed 24810192
[Consensus-based guidelines may prevent necessary research]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 134 (2), 148-9
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.13.1313, PubMed 24477144
From clinical questions to trustworthy answers
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 133 (15), 1611-4
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.13.0650, PubMed 23970279
Risk stratification to predict pain during unsedated colonoscopy: results of a multicenter cohort study
Endoscopy, 45 (9), 691-6
DOI 10.1055/s-0033-1344239, PubMed 23884794
[Who should perform endoscopies?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 133 (11), 1171
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.13.0625, PubMed 23759774
Long-term effectiveness of endoscopic screening on incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer: A randomized trial
United European Gastroenterol J, 1 (3), 162-8
DOI 10.1177/2050640613483290, PubMed 24917955
[Pain in connection with colonoscopy in Norway]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 133 (10), 1074-8
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.12.1467, PubMed 23712171
Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline
Endoscopy, 45 (2), 142-50
DOI 10.1055/s-0032-1326186, PubMed 23335011
A tissue-based comparative effectiveness analysis of biomarkers for early detection of colorectal tumors
Clin Transl Gastroenterol, 3 (12), e27
DOI 10.1038/ctg.2012.21, PubMed 23324654
European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis: overview and introduction to the full supplement publication
Endoscopy, 45 (1), 51-9
DOI 10.1055/s-0032-1325997, PubMed 23212726
Prognosis in women with interval breast cancer: population based observational cohort study
BMJ, 345, e7536
DOI 10.1136/bmj.e7536, PubMed 23160783
European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition--Quality assurance in endoscopy in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis
Endoscopy, 44 Suppl 3, SE88-105
DOI 10.1055/s-0032-1309795, PubMed 23012124
Can old dogs learn new tricks?
J Interv Gastroenterol, 2 (3), 126-127
DOI 10.4161/jig.23733, PubMed 23805392
The NordICC Study: rationale and design of a randomized trial on colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer
Endoscopy, 44 (7), 695-702
DOI 10.1055/s-0032-1306895, PubMed 22723185
Comparative effectiveness research in cancer screening programmes
BMJ, 344, e2864
DOI 10.1136/bmj.e2864, PubMed 22628002
Reduced pain during screening colonoscopy with an ultrathin colonoscope: a randomized controlled trial
Endoscopy, 44 (8), 740-6
DOI 10.1055/s-0032-1309755, PubMed 22622786
Withdrawal time as a quality indicator for colonoscopy - a nationwide analysis
Endoscopy, 44 (5), 476-81
DOI 10.1055/s-0032-1306898, PubMed 22531983
Overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer due to mammography screening: results from the Norwegian screening program
Ann Intern Med, 156 (7), 491-9
DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-156-7-201204030-00005, PubMed 22473436
Incontinence after colonoscopy--an unrecognized and preventable problem. A cross-sectional study from the Gastronet quality assurance program
Endoscopy, 44 (4), 349-53
DOI 10.1055/s-0031-1291657, PubMed 22392101
Nitrous oxide for analgesia in colonoscopy without sedation
Gastrointest Endosc, 74 (6), 1347-53
DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.071, PubMed 22136779
Identification of an epigenetic biomarker panel with high sensitivity and specificity for colorectal cancer and adenomas
Mol Cancer, 10, 85
DOI 10.1186/1476-4598-10-85, PubMed 21777459
Biomarkers related to one-carbon metabolism as potential risk factors for distal colorectal adenomas
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 20 (8), 1726-35
DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0359, PubMed 21693628
Gastronet survey on the use of one- or two-person technique for colonoscopy insertion
BMC Gastroenterol, 11, 73
DOI 10.1186/1471-230X-11-73, PubMed 21672243
Magnetic endoscopic imaging versus standard colonoscopy in a routine colonoscopy setting: a randomized, controlled trial
Gastrointest Endosc, 73 (6), 1215-22
DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.054, PubMed 21481862
Single- vs. double-balloon enteroscopy in small-bowel diagnostics: a randomized multicenter trial
Endoscopy, 43 (6), 472-6
DOI 10.1055/s-0030-1256247, PubMed 21384320
Colonoscope with a sub-distal hyper-flaccid segment for improved insertion at colonoscopy: a randomized study
Scand J Gastroenterol, 46 (1), 104-8
DOI 10.3109/00365521.2010.521891, PubMed 20923378
Evidence for colorectal cancer screening
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 24 (4), 417-25
DOI 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005, PubMed 20833346
Patient satisfaction with on-demand sedation for outpatient colonoscopy
Endoscopy, 42 (8), 639-46
DOI 10.1055/s-0030-1255612, PubMed 20669075
Sustaining the vitality of colonoscopy quality improvement programmes over time. Experience from the Norwegian Gastronet programme
Scand J Gastroenterol, 45 (3), 362-9
DOI 10.3109/00365520903497106, PubMed 20095874
The First Transatlantic Symposium on Colorectal Cancer Screening
Endoscopy, 41 (9), 816-7
DOI 10.1055/s-0029-1215049, PubMed 19685421
Risk of colorectal cancer seven years after flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: randomised controlled trial
BMJ, 338, b1846
DOI 10.1136/bmj.b1846, PubMed 19483252
Improved breast cancer survival following introduction of an organized mammography screening program among both screened and unscreened women: a population-based cohort study
Breast Cancer Res, 11 (4), R44
DOI 10.1186/bcr2331, PubMed 19575807
Quality assurance as an integrated part of the electronic medical record - a prototype applied for colonoscopy
Scand J Gastroenterol, 44 (10), 1259-65
DOI 10.1080/00365520903132021, PubMed 19658021
Appointments timed in proximity to annual milestones and compliance with screening: randomised controlled trial
BMJ, 337, a2794
DOI 10.1136/bmj.a2794, PubMed 19091759
Patients' satisfaction: an important factor in quality control of gastroscopies
Scand J Gastroenterol, 43 (8), 1004-11
DOI 10.1080/00365520801958592, PubMed 19086282
Carbon dioxide insufflation improves intubation depth in double-balloon enteroscopy: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial
Endoscopy, 39 (12), 1064-7
DOI 10.1055/s-2007-966990, PubMed 18072057
Double-balloon enteroscopy for endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with a Roux-en-Y anastomosis
Endoscopy, 39 (12), 1068-71
DOI 10.1055/s-2007-966841, PubMed 18072058
Improvement in caecal intubation rate and pain reduction by using 3-dimensional magnetic imaging for unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized trial of patients referred for colonoscopy
Scand J Gastroenterol, 42 (7), 885-9
DOI 10.1080/00365520601127125, PubMed 17558914
Carbon dioxide insufflation for more comfortable endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial
Endoscopy, 39 (1), 58-64
DOI 10.1055/s-2006-945036, PubMed 17252462
[Politics and science in colorectal cancer screening]
Ugeskr Laeger, 168 (26-32), 2563-5
PubMed 16824412
[Politics and science in colorectal cancer screening]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 126 (13), 1766-7
PubMed 16794676
The Norwegian Gastronet project: Continuous quality improvement of colonoscopy in 14 Norwegian centres
Scand J Gastroenterol, 41 (4), 481-7
DOI 10.1080/00365520500265208, PubMed 16635918
[Screening for colorectal cancer. Collaboration among politicians and scientists is necessary]
Laeknabladid, 92 (7-8), 521-4
PubMed 16818999
Biopsy of colorectal polyps is not adequate for grading of neoplasia
Endoscopy, 37 (12), 1193-7
DOI 10.1055/s-2005-921031, PubMed 16329016
Evaluation of a novel colonoscope designed for easier passage through flexures: a randomized study
Endoscopy, 37 (11), 1123-6
DOI 10.1055/s-2005-870444, PubMed 16281143
Lifestyle-related risk factors and chemoprevention for colorectal neoplasia: experience from the large-scale NORCCAP screening trial
Eur J Cancer Prev, 14 (4), 373-9
DOI 10.1097/00008469-200508000-00010, PubMed 16030428
Carbon dioxide insufflation in colonoscopy: safe and effective in sedated patients
Endoscopy, 37 (8), 706-9
DOI 10.1055/s-2005-870154, PubMed 16032487
Polyethylene glycol versus sodium phosphate in bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: a randomized trial
Endoscopy, 37 (6), 537-41
DOI 10.1055/s-2005-861315, PubMed 15933926
Sensitivity of pain rating scales in an endoscopy trial
Clin J Pain, 21 (4), 292-6
DOI 10.1097/01.ajp.0000110636.14355.3e, PubMed 15951645
Testing for faecal calprotectin (PhiCal) in the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention trial on flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: comparison with an immunochemical test for occult blood (FlexSure OBT)
Gut, 53 (9), 1329-33
DOI 10.1136/gut.2004.039032, PubMed 15306594
[Systematic quality control programme for colonoscopy in an endoscopy centre in Norway]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 124 (10), 1402-5
PubMed 15195182
Inter-endoscopist variation in polyp and neoplasia pick-up rates in flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer
Scand J Gastroenterol, 38 (12), 1268-74
DOI 10.1080/00365520310006513, PubMed 14750648
Air and carbon dioxide volumes insufflated during colonoscopy
Gastrointest Endosc, 58 (2), 203-6
DOI 10.1067/mge.2003.340, PubMed 12872086
Quality control in colorectal cancer screening: systematic microbiological investigation of endoscopes used in the NORCCAP (Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention) trial
BMC Gastroenterol, 3, 15
DOI 10.1186/1471-230X-3-15, PubMed 12803654
The Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention (NORCCAP) screening study: baseline findings and implementations for clinical work-up in age groups 50-64 years
Scand J Gastroenterol, 38 (6), 635-42
DOI 10.1080/00365520310003002, PubMed 12825872
Grading of distal colorectal adenomas as predictors for proximal colonic neoplasia and choice of endoscope in population screening: experience from the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention study (NORCCAP)
Gut, 52 (3), 398-403
DOI 10.1136/gut.52.3.398, PubMed 12584223
Use of a disposable sheath system for flexible sigmoidoscopy in decentralized colorectal cancer screening
Endoscopy, 34 (10), 814-8
DOI 10.1055/s-2002-34273, PubMed 12244504
Carbon dioxide insufflation reduces discomfort due to flexible sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening
Scand J Gastroenterol, 37 (9), 1103-7
DOI 10.1080/003655202320378329, PubMed 12374237
Continuous evaluation of patient satisfaction in endoscopy centres
Scand J Gastroenterol, 37 (7), 850-5
DOI 10.1080/713786520, PubMed 12190102
NORCCAP (Norwegian colorectal cancer prevention): a randomised trial to assess the safety and efficacy of carbon dioxide versus air insufflation in colonoscopy
Gut, 50 (5), 604-7
DOI 10.1136/gut.50.5.604, PubMed 11950803
Design, organization and management of a controlled population screening study for detection of colorectal neoplasia: attendance rates in the NORCCAP study (Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention)
Scand J Gastroenterol, 37 (5), 568-73
DOI 10.1080/00365520252903125, PubMed 12059059
ACD versus standard CPR in a prehospital setting
Resuscitation, 33 (2), 117-24
DOI 10.1016/s0300-9572(96)01021-0, PubMed 9025127
Review articles
The New European Medical Device Regulation: Balancing Innovation and Patient Safety
Ann Intern Med, 176 (6), 844-848
DOI 10.7326/M23-0454, PubMed 37068279
Risk Factors for Metachronous Colorectal Cancer or Advanced Adenomas After Endoscopic Resection of High-risk Adenomas
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 21 (3), 630-643
DOI 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.12.005, PubMed 36549471
Variability in adenoma detection rate in control groups of randomized colonoscopy trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Gastrointest Endosc, 97 (2), 212-225.e7
DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2022.10.009, PubMed 36243103
Artificial intelligence for polyp detection during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Endoscopy, 53 (3), 277-284
DOI 10.1055/a-1201-7165, PubMed 32557490
Assessment of cancer screening effectiveness in the era of screening programs
Eur J Epidemiol, 35 (10), 891-897
DOI 10.1007/s10654-020-00684-7, PubMed 32929645
Efficacy and Tolerability of High- vs Low-Volume Split-Dose Bowel Cleansing Regimens for Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 18 (7), 1454-1465.e14
DOI 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.10.044, PubMed 31683057
Performance measures for small-bowel endoscopy: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative
United European Gastroenterol J, 7 (5), 614-641
DOI 10.1177/2050640619850365, PubMed 31210941
Performance measures for endoscopy services: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative
United European Gastroenterol J, 7 (1), 21-44
DOI 10.1177/2050640618810242, PubMed 30788114
Performance measures for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative
United European Gastroenterol J, 6 (10), 1448-1460
DOI 10.1177/2050640618808157, PubMed 30574315
Quality Indicators in Colonoscopy
Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol, 15 (3), 416-428
DOI 10.1007/s11938-017-0140-4, PubMed 28702775
Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative
United European Gastroenterol J, 5 (3), 309-334
DOI 10.1177/2050640617700014, PubMed 28507745
Systematic review with meta-analysis: the comparative effectiveness of aspirin vs. screening for colorectal cancer prevention
Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 45 (2), 193-204
DOI 10.1111/apt.13857, PubMed 27859394
Performance measures for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy quality improvement initiative
United European Gastroenterol J, 4 (5), 629-656
DOI 10.1177/2050640616664843, PubMed 27733906
Reporting systems in gastrointestinal endoscopy: Requirements and standards facilitating quality improvement: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy position statement
United European Gastroenterol J, 4 (2), 172-6
DOI 10.1177/2050640616629079, PubMed 27087943
Benefits and harms of mammography screening
Breast Cancer Res, 17 (1), 63
DOI 10.1186/s13058-015-0525-z, PubMed 25928287
Effectiveness, training and quality assurance of colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer
Gut, 64 (6), 982-90
DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308076, PubMed 25804631
Flexible sigmoidoscopy versus faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals
Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013 (9), CD009259
DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD009259.pub2, PubMed 24085634
Current status of screening for colorectal cancer
Ann Oncol, 24 (8), 1963-72
DOI 10.1093/annonc/mdt157, PubMed 23619033
Colorectal cancer screening--optimizing current strategies and new directions
Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 10 (3), 130-42
DOI 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.12, PubMed 23381005
Principles, effectiveness and caveats in screening for cancer
Br J Surg, 100 (1), 55-65
DOI 10.1002/bjs.8995, PubMed 23212620
Colorectal cancer screening
J Intern Med, 270 (2), 87-98
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02399.x, PubMed 21575082
[Prevention and early diagnosis of colorectal cancer]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 127 (20), 2688-91
PubMed 17952153
[Presentation of statistical analysis in the Journal of the Norwegian Medical Association]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 125 (16), 2183-7
PubMed 16138131
Other articles
Authors' Reply: Interpreting epidemiologic studies of colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer prevention
Eur J Epidemiol (in press)
DOI 10.1007/s10654-023-01077-2, PubMed 38261147
[Not Available]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 143 (18)
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.23.0553, PubMed 38088289
Authors' Reply: Interpreting epidemiologic studies of colorectal cancer prevention
Eur J Epidemiol, 39 (1), 99
DOI 10.1007/s10654-023-01070-9, PubMed 37950085
Interpreting epidemiologic studies of colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer prevention: understanding the mechanisms of action is key
Eur J Epidemiol, 38 (9), 929-931
DOI 10.1007/s10654-023-01043-y, PubMed 37667139
Gastrointestinal endoscopy devices and the European Union Medical Device Regulation: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement
Endoscopy, 55 (6), 578-581
DOI 10.1055/a-2052-2540, PubMed 37080238
Colonoscopy Screening and Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality. Reply
N Engl J Med, 388 (4), 378-379
DOI 10.1056/NEJMc2215192, PubMed 36720146
Reply to: Letter to the Editor regarding "Covid-19 transmission in fitness centers in Norway-a randomized trial"
BMC Public Health, 22 (1), 2437
DOI 10.1186/s12889-022-14799-x, PubMed 36575428
UEG position paper: Obesity and digestive health
United European Gastroenterol J, 10 (10), 1199-1201
DOI 10.1002/ueg2.12334, PubMed 36457185
Letter: long-term colorectal cancer incidence and mortality after adenoma removal associated with heritable factors, colonoscopic surveillance and aspirin-authors' reply
Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 55 (10), 1363-1364
DOI 10.1111/apt.16929, PubMed 35472187
Digestive cancer screening across Europe
United European Gastroenterol J, 10 (4), 435-437
DOI 10.1002/ueg2.12230, PubMed 35474447
Complete polyp resection with cold snare versus hot snare polypectomy for polyps of 4-9 mm: a randomized controlled trial
Endoscopy, 54 (10), 961-969
DOI 10.1055/a-1734-7952, PubMed 35008112
ESGE and ESGENA Position Statement on gastrointestinal endoscopy and COVID-19: Updated guidance for the era of vaccines and viral variants
Endoscopy, 54 (2), 211-216
DOI 10.1055/a-1700-4897, PubMed 34933373
Colorectal Cancer Screening: Randomized Trials Are Essential to Support Recommendations
Ann Intern Med, 175 (1), 129-130
DOI 10.7326/M21-3770, PubMed 34748373
Addressing false-positive findings with artificial intelligence for polyp detection
Endoscopy, 53 (9), 941-942
DOI 10.1055/a-1381-7849, PubMed 34438457
Evidence and Precaution for Legal Health Interventions: Learning From the COVID-19 Pandemic
Ann Intern Med, 174 (10), 1456-1457
DOI 10.7326/M21-2839, PubMed 34370512
Hopes and Hypes for Artificial Intelligence in Colorectal Cancer Screening
Gastroenterology, 161 (3), 774-777
DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.04.078, PubMed 33989659
Deep learning and cancer biomarkers: recognising lead-time bias
Lancet, 397 (10270), 194
DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32402-8, PubMed 33453776
Colorectal Cancer Screening in Young Adults: About Carcinoid Tumors and Cancer
Ann Intern Med, 174 (2), 263-264
DOI 10.7326/M20-7244, PubMed 33315472
Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2020
Endoscopy, 52 (8), 687-700
DOI 10.1055/a-1185-3109, PubMed 32572858
Presentation of numbers: do let that fool you
Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen., 140 (8), 738
[Presentation of figures: don’t be fooled]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 140 (8)
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.20.0378, PubMed 32463198
The future of colorectal cancer screening: Parentalism or shared decision-making?
CMAJ, 192 (18), E484
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.74839, PubMed 32366471
Principles for Evaluation of Surveillance After Removal of Colorectal Polyps: Recommendations From the World Endoscopy Organization
Gastroenterology, 158 (6), 1529-1533.e4
DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.12.052, PubMed 32240700
National Screening Program for Bowel Cancer
Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen., 140 (3), 222
Disparities in Preventive Health Services: Targeting Minorities and Majorities
Ann Intern Med, 172 (4), 287-288
DOI 10.7326/M19-3899, PubMed 31931529
Improving cancer screening programs
Science, 367 (6474), 143-144
DOI 10.1126/science.aay3156, PubMed 31919207
Detection rates during colonoscopy: What matters most?
Endoscopy, 52 (1), 15-16
DOI 10.1055/a-1058-8854, PubMed 31853929
Colorectal cancer screening, right?
Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen., 139 (15), 1450-1451
Colorectal cancer screening with faecal immunochemical testing, sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy: a clinical practice guideline
BMJ, 367, l5515
DOI 10.1136/bmj.l5515, PubMed 31578196
Estimating the Effect of Preventive Services With Databases of Administrative Claims: Reasons to Be Concerned
Am J Epidemiol, 188 (10), 1764-1767
DOI 10.1093/aje/kwz049, PubMed 30869122
Reply to the letter to the editor 'Cancer survivors: surveillance or not surveillance?' by Santeufemia and Miolo
Ann Oncol, 30 (9), 1531-1532
DOI 10.1093/annonc/mdz190, PubMed 31198953
Revisiting surveillance schemes for cancer survivors
Ann Oncol, 30 (6), 881-883
DOI 10.1093/annonc/mdz107, PubMed 30895293
From Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines to Headlines: Beware!
Ann Intern Med, 170 (10), 734
DOI 10.7326/L19-0086, PubMed 31108525
Author Reply to: The name of the game: Is preventive screening "cancer screening?"
Eur J Clin Invest, 49 (6), e13097
DOI 10.1111/eci.13097, PubMed 30829396
Time to abandon early detection cancer screening
Eur J Clin Invest, 49 (3), e13062
DOI 10.1111/eci.13062, PubMed 30565674
Long-Term Effectiveness of Sigmoidoscopy Screening in Women and Men
Ann Intern Med, 169 (9), 663-664
DOI 10.7326/L18-0512, PubMed 30398636
[Screening for melanoma is a poor idea]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 138 (17)
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.18.0600, PubMed 30378406
Screening for melanoma is a bad idea
Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen., 138 (17), 1589
When no guideline recommendation is the best recommendation
Lancet, 392 (10151), 898-899
DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31671-4, PubMed 30238877
Overdiagnosis in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Time to Acknowledge a Blind Spot
Gastroenterology, 155 (3), 592-595
DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.07.037, PubMed 30076834
From Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines to Headlines: Beware!
Ann Intern Med, 169 (6), 405-406
DOI 10.7326/M18-1720, PubMed 29987330
Why a randomized melanoma screening trial is not a good idea
Br J Dermatol, 179 (2), 532-533
DOI 10.1111/bjd.16784, PubMed 29893490
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Primary Clostridium difficile Infection
N Engl J Med, 378 (26), 2535-2536
DOI 10.1056/NEJMc1803103, PubMed 29860912
Doubt
Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen., 137 (20), 1577-1578
[Not Available]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 137 (20)
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.17.0875, PubMed 29094556
Right and correct package
Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen., 137 (17), 1264
New specialist education for doctors- from Swiss cheese to Kraftkar?
Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen., 137 (17), 1270-1271
[Correct and proper critical pathway]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 137 (17)
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.17.0510, PubMed 28925233
Colorectal adenomas, surveillance, and cancer
Lancet Oncol, 18 (8), e427
DOI 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30473-4, PubMed 28759374
[Not Available]
Lakartidningen, 114
PubMed 28696487
[Data sharing]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 137 (10), 738
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.17.0366, PubMed 28551975
Screening Colonoscopy to Prevent Colorectal Cancer Among Medicare Beneficiaries Aged 70 to 79 Years
Ann Intern Med, 166 (10), 758-759
DOI 10.7326/L17-0138, PubMed 28505646
More harm than benefit - how much should the patients know? Reply
Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen., 137 (9), 599
[Not Available]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 137 (9), 599
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.17.0296, PubMed 28468459
Authors' reply to Doherty and Hawkins
BMJ, 356, j1267
DOI 10.1136/bmj.j1267, PubMed 28283482
Foreword
Endoscopy, 49 (3), 213
DOI 10.1055/s-0043-102442, PubMed 28249316
[More harm than benefit - how much should the patients know?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 137 (3), 175-176
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.16.0954, PubMed 28181749
Cancer surveillance in gastroenterology practice
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 30 (6), 853-854
DOI 10.1016/j.bpg.2016.10.016, PubMed 27938780
America, We Are Confused: The Updated U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation on Colorectal Cancer Screening
Ann Intern Med, 166 (2), 139-140
DOI 10.7326/M16-1805, PubMed 27820949
[Not Available]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 136 (16), 1326-7
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.16.0690, PubMed 27637038
Colonoscopy and Risk of Infective Endocarditis in the Elderly
J Am Coll Cardiol, 68 (5), 570-571
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.041, PubMed 27470461
Cecal intubation failure: Refer or change technique?
Gastrointest Endosc, 83 (6), 1245-7
DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2015.12.014, PubMed 27206588
Who Is for CO2? Slow Adoption of Carbon Dioxide Insufflation in Colonoscopy
Ann Intern Med, 165 (2), 145-6
DOI 10.7326/M16-0209, PubMed 27159139
Commentary: "Randomize, Then Consent" or "Consent, Then Randomize"?: Revitalizing the Issue of Preconsent Randomization
Epidemiology, 27 (3), 393-4
DOI 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000469, PubMed 26849639
Pain and sedation during colonoscopy - a never ending story
Endosc Int Open, 4 (5), E538-9
DOI 10.1055/s-0042-106085, PubMed 27227111
Recognizing Data Generation
N Engl J Med, 374 (19), 1898
DOI 10.1056/NEJMc1603789, PubMed 27096437
Endoscopy again supports Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month
Endoscopy, 48 (3), 209
DOI 10.1055/s-0042-102468, PubMed 26906311
[M. Bretthauer & E. Hem reply]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 136 (1), 10
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.15.1307, PubMed 26757645
[Not Available]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 136 (1), 24-6
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.15.1257, PubMed 26757655
Circumcision of boys Reply
Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen., 136 (1), 10
Circumcision of boys Reply
Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen., 135 (23-24), 2130
[M. Bretthauer & E. Hem reply]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 135 (23-24), 2130
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.15.1254, PubMed 26674025
[Circumcision of boys]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 135 (21), 1926-7
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.15.0756, PubMed 26577316
Water exchange versus carbon dioxide insufflation in unsedated colonoscopy: less is more Reply
Endoscopy, 47 (10), 959
Reply to Ishaq et al
Endoscopy, 47 (10), 959
DOI 10.1055/s-0034-1392409, PubMed 26417975
More adenomas - less cancer? Advanced imaging in colonoscopy
Endoscopy, 47 (5), 396-7
DOI 10.1055/s-0034-1391864, PubMed 25910007
Long-Term Colorectal-Cancer Mortality after Adenoma Removal REPLY
N. Engl. J. Med., 371 (21), 2035-2036
Long-term colorectal-cancer mortality after adenoma removal
N Engl J Med, 371 (21), 2036-7
DOI 10.1056/NEJMc1411954, PubMed 25409378
[P. Gjersvik and colleagues reply]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 134 (12-13), 1215
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.14.0744, PubMed 24989185
Endoscopy training: time to stop counting procedures?
Gut, 63 (11), 1686-7
DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-306765, PubMed 24604824
Too much mammography
BMJ, 348, g1403
DOI 10.1136/bmj.g1403, PubMed 24519765
New polyps, old tricks: controversy about removing benign bowel lesions
BMJ, 347, f5843
DOI 10.1136/bmj.f5843, PubMed 24103540
Failure to account for selection-bias
Int J Cancer, 133 (11), 2751-3
DOI 10.1002/ijc.28244, PubMed 23649899
Computed tomography colonography vs. colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: close call, but not closed case
Endoscopy, 45 (3), 159-60
DOI 10.1055/s-0032-1326208, PubMed 23446666
Risk stratification for advanced colorectal neoplasia--letter
Cancer Prev Res (Phila), 5 (12), 1405; author reply 1406
DOI 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-12-0383, PubMed 23151804
Limited use of nonprogram screening in Norway
Int J Cancer, 132 (7), 1723-4
DOI 10.1002/ijc.27807, PubMed 22933134
Overdiagnosis of Invasive Breast Cancer due to Mammography Screening RESPONSE
Ann. Intern. Med., 157 (3), 221-222
DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-157-3-201208070-00025
Single- versus double-balloon enteroscopy: the evidence base: Comment on Endoscopy essentials, Small-bowel endoscopy
Endoscopy, 44 (8), 799; author reply 800
DOI 10.1055/s-0032-1310001, PubMed 22833025
Colorectal-Cancer Screening Reply
N. Engl. J. Med., 366 (22), 2131
Colonoscopy as a triage screening test
N Engl J Med, 366 (8), 759-60
DOI 10.1056/NEJMe1114639, PubMed 22356330
[What is established treatment?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 131 (13-14), 1275
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.11.13E1, PubMed 21725376
Quality assurance in gastroenterology
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 25 (3), 335-6
DOI 10.1016/j.bpg.2011.05.008, PubMed 21764001
Turning science into clinical practice - the case of carbon dioxide insufflation
Endoscopy, 42 (12), 1104-5
DOI 10.1055/s-0030-1255973, PubMed 21120777
[Colorectal cancer screening--at last discussed!]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 130 (20), 2012
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.10.0932, PubMed 20967034
Colorectal cancer screening Author's reply
Br. Med. J., 341, c4620
DOI 10.1136/bmj.c4620
["Shall I not be randomized?"]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 130 (11), 1119
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.10.0590, PubMed 20531489
Which tool is best for colorectal cancer screening?
BMJ, 340, c2831
DOI 10.1136/bmj.c2831, PubMed 20516015
[Do you understand me?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 129 (21), 2211
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.09.1081, PubMed 19898565
Capsule Endoscopy versus Colonoscopy REPLY
N. Engl. J. Med., 361 (16), 1609-1610
[A year with New England Journal of Medicine]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 129 (19), 1971
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.09.1022, PubMed 19823197
The capsule and colorectal-cancer screening--the crux of the matter
N Engl J Med, 361 (3), 300-1
DOI 10.1056/NEJMe0903924, PubMed 19605836
Spontaneous regression of invasive breast cancer: does this study answer the question?
Arch Intern Med, 169 (10), 997
DOI 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.91, PubMed 19468097
[Without registration, no publishing!]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 129 (8), 733
DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.09.08E1, PubMed 19373295
Erroneous on screening colonoscopy
Z. Gastroent., 46 (6), 633
Are sodium phosphate tablets better than polyethylene glycol solution plus bisacodyl tablets for bowel preparation?
Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol, 5 (6), 296-7
DOI 10.1038/ncpgasthep1142, PubMed 18461058
[Statistical significance and clinical relevance]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 128 (3), 279
PubMed 18264146
[Colorectal cancer--a disease one doesn't talk about]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 127 (20), 2651
PubMed 17952144
Colonic explosion: an unavoidable complication?
Endoscopy, 39 (3), 258
DOI 10.1055/s-2007-966200, PubMed 17385113
[Can CT colonography replace coloscopy?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 126 (11), 1464
PubMed 16732337
The science and politics of colorectal cancer screening
PLoS Med, 3 (1), e36; quiz e104
DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030036, PubMed 16383349
[Quality improvement in Norwegian hospitals]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 125 (9), 1150
PubMed 15880147
[When can generic preparations be used?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 124 (20), 2598
PubMed 15534628
[Information about mammography screening]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 124 (17), 2227
PubMed 15356683
Re: Baseline findings of the Italian multicenter randomized controlled trial of "once-only sigmoidoscopy"--SCORE
J Natl Cancer Inst, 95 (14), 1089-90; author reply 1090
DOI 10.1093/jnci/95.14.1089, PubMed 12865459
The use of CO2 in colonoscopy
Gastrointest Endosc, 57 (3), 436-7; author reply 437-8
DOI 10.1067/mge.2003.108, PubMed 12612542
[Practice from Germany not sanctioned as specialist education in Norway]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 120 (21), 2580-1
PubMed 11071005
Book chapters
Kliniske studier
In Epidemiologiske og kliniske forskningsmetoder, Gyldendal akademisk, Oslo, [285]-[301]
BIBSYS 071649743
Theses
Colorectal cancer screening by flexible sigmoidoscopy: aspects of quality control and quality improvement based on experience from the NORCCAP (Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention) trial
In Series of dissertations submitted to the Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Unipub, Oslo, no. 146, 1 b. (flere pag.)
BIBSYS 040132331, ISBN 82-8072-079-0